Confirmed users
613
edits
(added whole status) |
(→Risks/Issues: minor format and content corrections) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|| AMO Review Queue - we have insufficient resources for the listed review queue which is very long and growing. We recently hired one new FTE, but also moved one reviewer over to wengineering development. We do have budget for two contract reviewers, but hiring has been a challenge. Review queue challenges illustrated here: http://diox.github.io/amo-review-times/ and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E41MCpqf71Ayx1Im4dCspu7bxNzaMpOSYiVDQXL8dK4 | || AMO Review Queue - we have insufficient resources for the listed review queue which is very long and growing. We recently hired one new FTE, but also moved one reviewer over to wengineering development. We do have budget for two contract reviewers, but hiring has been a challenge. Review queue challenges illustrated here: http://diox.github.io/amo-review-times/ and https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E41MCpqf71Ayx1Im4dCspu7bxNzaMpOSYiVDQXL8dK4 | ||
|| Lisa/Add-on Review team || Additional contract reviewers being hired now for short term mitigation, one starts Friday at 30 hrs but second hire has not yet been made. Also longer term changes to how we review are planned, SLA being established, etc. | |||
|- | |- | ||
AMO Validator - the validator has several issues slowing down the queue - it is not providing very useful results to developers, and it is rejecting 4/5 | || AMO Validator - the validator has several issues slowing down the queue - it is not providing very useful results to developers, and it is rejecting 4/5 add-ons. || Validator team, Andy, Kev, Larissa || We have plans in development, 2 Engineers assigned to improvements, and the first phase of these is nearly complete. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |