Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,217
edits
Electrolysis/Meetings/2016-02-04: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Electrolysis/Meetings/2016-02-04 (view source)
Revision as of 17:06, 4 February 2016
, 4 February 2016stability analysis
(gabor's progress) |
(stability analysis) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
* {{bug|1198191}} (p1 perf, - Confirm existing tab-switch telemetry measurement are meaningful) - They are not. In non-10s mode we don't have much working (see follow-up it's already triaged as m8) but I don't think that there is a fair way to compare non-10s vs e10s on telemetry (if the content process is busy tab switch time will be long but in non-e10s browser will hang so you won't be able to start a tab switch). I would prefer to rely on talos tests, and what we have seems like a fair one (tps). | * {{bug|1198191}} (p1 perf, - Confirm existing tab-switch telemetry measurement are meaningful) - They are not. In non-10s mode we don't have much working (see follow-up it's already triaged as m8) but I don't think that there is a fair way to compare non-10s vs e10s on telemetry (if the content process is busy tab switch time will be long but in non-e10s browser will hang so you won't be able to start a tab switch). I would prefer to rely on talos tests, and what we have seems like a fair one (tps). | ||
* {{bug|1182637}} (p1 perf, - e10s is jankier than non-e10s) - Waiting for data to come in... Should we ping someone about this? I would expect that by now we have enough data to see if something is really bad. | * {{bug|1182637}} (p1 perf, - e10s is jankier than non-e10s) - Waiting for data to come in... Should we ping someone about this? I would expect that by now we have enough data to see if something is really bad. | ||
== bsmedberg (poiru?) == | |||
Stability analysis (with addons) | |||
build ID non-e10s e10s-parent e10s-content | |||
20160127070712 26.397 14.489 37.661 | |||
Bug 1210099 is 30% of content crashes, specific to addons. | |||
Next steps: repeat this analysis excluding people with addons, continue to file and prioritize the content process topcrash list: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/search/?ActiveExperiment=e10s-beta45-withaddons%40experiments.mozilla.org&process_type=content&_facets=signature&_columns=date&_columns=signature&_columns=product&_columns=version&_columns=build_id&_columns=platform#facet-signature | |||