Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925
edits
(Add additional cert to incident L) |
(Add quote about 72 being all) |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
2016-08-25: "[https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/k9PBmyLCi8I/vanzaHaZCgAJ For BR auditor, I think this issue is too technical that fewer auditor can find out this problem.]" | 2016-08-25: "[https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/k9PBmyLCi8I/vanzaHaZCgAJ For BR auditor, I think this issue is too technical that fewer auditor can find out this problem.]" | ||
[https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/k9PBmyLCi8I/gksYkOTLCwAJ List of crt.sh links to certificates involved] - total 72. | [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/k9PBmyLCi8I/gksYkOTLCwAJ List of crt.sh links to certificates involved] - total 72. Richard Wang [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/yZaJh0KxFUc/6RYlFFQiDAAJ said]: "We checked our system, the certificates issued related using higher level port website control validation is totally 72 certificates. To be clear, those certificates are validated by website control validation method that using other port except 80 and 443." | ||
2016-09-04: [https://www.wosign.com/report/wosign_incidents_report_09042016.pdf Official incident report]. | 2016-09-04: [https://www.wosign.com/report/wosign_incidents_report_09042016.pdf Official incident report]. |