Connected Devices/Projects/Magnet/Sprint 11: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 98: Line 98:
** Scanners ones? We will use it after releasing the first version of the app. In the previous version we had the GPS and the physical web scanners together, we would need to create one repo specific for the Geolocation staff in Journey
** Scanners ones? We will use it after releasing the first version of the app. In the previous version we had the GPS and the physical web scanners together, we would need to create one repo specific for the Geolocation staff in Journey
* What happens if we need to use "Project Magnet" name for the beta version of the app we are working on? It would be really bad if we had to use the same name because users will update the app and we'll download a complete different application without physical browser. Right now the documentation in github is really confusing. Journey is a code name and we are waiting for Porfirio to let us know about the definitive name
* What happens if we need to use "Project Magnet" name for the beta version of the app we are working on? It would be really bad if we had to use the same name because users will update the app and we'll download a complete different application without physical browser. Right now the documentation in github is really confusing. Journey is a code name and we are waiting for Porfirio to let us know about the definitive name
 
* Visual Work: agreed with the Agency the probable timeline (Start Date: Jan 30th, Deadline: March 3rd)
* Timeline execution and Usability Test? Possible dates 20th Feb - 24th Feb while Jakuv (Visual designer) is on PTO that week
* Usability Test? Possible dates 20th Feb - 24th Feb while Jakuv (Visual designer) is on PTO that week. We could do the final refinements the following week.
 
** Francis thinks that we could start the recruitment the following week to have time in advance. He thinks Vancouver could be the place, as Mihaela is there and also Wilson. Other interesting option could be split the participants in London and in Vancouver but it's better
** What about Testing.com? It just send people to web sites but you can not have a session/question interview, perhaps it fits better when you have a very well defined question.
** What about reaching the participants from the previous research who seem very enthusiastic with this idea? It could work if we split the research in two cities. Francis will talk Mihaela about the details.


== Issues during this sprint ==
== Issues during this sprint ==
Confirmed users
1,225

edits

Navigation menu