4
edits
CA/CT Redaction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Logging Reveals Commercially Sensitive Information: this one was not for domain-label-name redaction, but for name-constrainted intermediate
(→Makes DOS Easier: this one was ment to be about being proxy of DOS. not target of DOS.) |
(→Logging Reveals Commercially Sensitive Information: this one was not for domain-label-name redaction, but for name-constrainted intermediate) |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
* Manufacturers using IoT certificates won't want to show the number of devices they have shipped, and redaction may help keep this information private. | * Manufacturers using IoT certificates won't want to show the number of devices they have shipped, and redaction may help keep this information private. | ||
* Competitors scanning CT logs could infer new product/service offerings prior to their public release. | * Competitors scanning CT logs could infer new product/service offerings prior to their public release. | ||
domain label name redaction do not work fine with above problem, but some other redaction mechanisms (i.e. use of name-constrainted intermediate, single entry for STAR certificate) should work. | |||
===== Response ===== | ===== Response ===== | ||