Confirmed users, Administrators
5,526
edits
CA/Required or Recommended Practices: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Add sub-section about CAA domains being listed in CP/CPS
(Moving Detailed Review to before discussion) |
m (Add sub-section about CAA domains being listed in CP/CPS) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* The CP/CPS must be available in an English version. The non-English version may be authoritative (as that's the working language of the CA) but the CA is responsible for ensuring that the translation is not materially different from the authoritative version of the document. | * The CP/CPS must be available in an English version. The non-English version may be authoritative (as that's the working language of the CA) but the CA is responsible for ensuring that the translation is not materially different from the authoritative version of the document. | ||
* The CA must provide references to the CP/CPS sections (e.g., by section number and/or page number) that address the requirements of the Mozilla policy. | * The CA must provide references to the CP/CPS sections (e.g., by section number and/or page number) that address the requirements of the Mozilla policy. | ||
===== CAA Domains listed in CP/CPS ===== | |||
Section 2.2 of the [https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/ BRs] states: "CA's Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice | |||
Statement ... shall clearly specify the set of Issuer Domain Names that the CA recognises in CAA "issue" or | |||
"issuewild" records as permitting it to issue. | |||
===== CP/CPS Documents will be Reviewed! ===== | ===== CP/CPS Documents will be Reviewed! ===== | ||