589
edits
Thunderbird/StatusMeetings/2009-01-06: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Thunderbird/StatusMeetings/2009-01-06 (view source)
Revision as of 17:39, 6 January 2009
, 6 January 2009→QA Updates
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
** <strike>{{Bug|470835}} nsMsgLocalMailFolder::AddMessage (should be fixed in 12-23 nightly)</strike> (optimistically gone) | ** <strike>{{Bug|470835}} nsMsgLocalMailFolder::AddMessage (should be fixed in 12-23 nightly)</strike> (optimistically gone) | ||
* bugday, [[Thunderbird:QA_TestDay:2009-01-08|first of 2009]] focused on trunk (we're losing ground on that front of the triage war) | * bugday, [[Thunderbird:QA_TestDay:2009-01-08|first of 2009]] focused on trunk (we're losing ground on that front of the triage war) | ||
Uncomfirmed bug count rose over the holidays and needs to be driven down. | |||
* litmus: we can now get reports of updated/new litmus tests for Thunderbird only, which will help us to manage updating of tests | * litmus: we can now get reports of updated/new litmus tests for Thunderbird only, which will help us to manage updating of tests | ||
* crash-stats group has put up [http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/mtbf/of/Thunderbird/development MTBF reports] for milestone and development releases. It's still a work in progress. And there is a bug outstanding that causes 3.0b1 (and b2pre?) to not be shown. On the development view, MTBF of 3.0b2pre is stated as over 10x better than 3.0b1pre, but crash rate appears to be about the same. Also note the data may not be accurate for the entire user population, as we think it doesn't included data from users who have no crashes. | * crash-stats group has put up [http://crash-stats.mozilla.com/mtbf/of/Thunderbird/development MTBF reports] for milestone and development releases. It's still a work in progress. And there is a bug outstanding that causes 3.0b1 (and b2pre?) to not be shown. On the development view, MTBF of 3.0b2pre is stated as over 10x better than 3.0b1pre, but crash rate appears to be about the same. Also note the data may not be accurate for the entire user population, as we think it doesn't included data from users who have no crashes. | ||