Confirmed users, Administrators
5,526
edits
CA/Audit Statements: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
formatting to clarify steps
m (formatting to clarify steps) |
m (formatting to clarify steps) |
||
| Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
==== Comprehensive Check ==== | ==== Comprehensive Check ==== | ||
This check is only needed if the Standard Check was not successful. | This check is only needed if the Standard Check was not successful. | ||
* Require the ETSI auditor to provide a comprehensive written explanation about why they are not conformant with the above mentioned scheme. The auditor must provide a rationale clearly referring back to all of the following: | |||
** European Accreditation to demonstrate they act under the EU accreditation scheme, | |||
** ISO 17065 plus ETSI EN 310 403 to demonstrate they are accredited/allowed to audit publicly trusted CA/Trust Service Provider according to ETSI EN 319 401 and ETSI EN 319 411-1 and | |||
** ETSI EN 319 411-2 for QWACS certificates according to the EU eIDAS Regulation 910/2014. | |||
* Review the documents and explanation. | |||
* Request external review from ACAB’c to provide opinion about the CAB's accreditation. | |||