251
edits
Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Review Decision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Review Decision (view source)
Revision as of 15:04, 29 July 2020
, 29 July 2020→Content Policy: Added Trademark Policy back in
(→Content Policy: Reject and escalate immediately in case of certain sexual content) |
(→Content Policy: Added Trademark Policy back in) |
||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Spam: The listing contains a large amount of words and links unrelated to the add-on’s functionality clearly intending to increase SEO rating. || Reject Immediately | | Spam: The listing contains a large amount of words and links unrelated to the add-on’s functionality clearly intending to increase SEO rating. || Reject Immediately | ||
|- | |||
| Trademarks: The add-on is named “Mozilla Frobnicator”, “Firefox Spice Dispenser” or similar, instead of “Frobnicator for Mozilla” or “Spice Dispenser for Firefox”. | |||
|- | |||
| Trademarks: The add-on is related to [Pocket](https://getpocket.com/), and is named “Pocket Reader” or similar, instead of “Reader for Pocket”. | |||
|- | |- | ||
| The add-on’s code, functionality or service used indicates that payment is required to use the core functionality of the add-on but the developer has not selected this option in the listing. || Delayed Reject | | The add-on’s code, functionality or service used indicates that payment is required to use the core functionality of the add-on but the developer has not selected this option in the listing. || Delayed Reject | ||