Add-ons/Reviewers/Guide/Review Decision: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Content Policy: Fix trademark rejection cells
(→‎Content Policy: wikis don't do markup :))
(→‎Content Policy: Fix trademark rejection cells)
Line 115: Line 115:
| Spam: The listing contains a large amount of words and links unrelated to the add-on’s functionality clearly intending to increase SEO rating. || Reject Immediately
| Spam: The listing contains a large amount of words and links unrelated to the add-on’s functionality clearly intending to increase SEO rating. || Reject Immediately
|-
|-
| Trademarks: The add-on is named “Mozilla Frobnicator”, “Firefox Spice Dispenser” or similar, instead of “Frobnicator for Mozilla” or “Spice Dispenser for Firefox”.
| Trademarks: The add-on is named “Mozilla Frobnicator”, “Firefox Spice Dispenser” or similar, instead of “Frobnicator for Mozilla” or “Spice Dispenser for Firefox”. || Reject Immediately
|-
|-
| Trademarks: The add-on is related to [https://getpocket.com/ Pocket], and is named “Pocket Reader” or similar, instead of “Reader for Pocket”.  
| Trademarks: The add-on is related to [https://getpocket.com/ Pocket], and is named “Pocket Reader” or similar, instead of “Reader for Pocket”. || Reject Immediately
|-
|-
| The add-on’s code, functionality or service used indicates that payment is required to use the core functionality of the add-on but the developer has not selected this option in the listing. || Delayed Reject
| The add-on’s code, functionality or service used indicates that payment is required to use the core functionality of the add-on but the developer has not selected this option in the listing. || Delayed Reject
251

edits

Navigation menu