6
edits
(→Security: new section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
** Reference at [http://groups.google.com/group/mozmill-dev/browse_thread/thread/f2491b768e37ca3c mozmill-dev] thread. | ** Reference at [http://groups.google.com/group/mozmill-dev/browse_thread/thread/f2491b768e37ca3c mozmill-dev] thread. | ||
= Security = | |||
A few security-related suggestions: | * A few security-related suggestions: | ||
** Windows | |||
*** Support Vista and Windows 7 64-bit systems | |||
**** 64-bit executable runnable with HW DEP and ASLR | |||
**** Optimized for Core 2 Duo and later Xeons with | |||
64-bits, NX, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3 | |||
** MacOS X | |||
*** Support Leopard and Snowleopard 64-bit systems | |||
**** 64-bit executable supporting all snowleopard security features (still hazy?) | |||
**** Optimized for Core 2 Duo and later Xeons with | |||
64-bits, NX, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3 | 64-bits, NX, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3 | ||
** Linux | |||
*** Support 64-bit versions | |||
**** Support whatever security is generally available | |||
**** Optimized for Core 2 Duo and later Xeons with | |||
64-bits, NX, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3 | |||
Although some code may slow down ~10% with longer addresses, use of the | ** Although some code may slow down ~10% with longer addresses, use of the | ||
XMM registers greatly speeds up some code as well. Overall, I would | XMM registers greatly speeds up some code as well. Overall, I would | ||
expect performance to be about the same based on other benchmarks. | expect performance to be about the same based on other benchmarks. |
edits