15
edits
Education/EduCourse/Week2Questions: Difference between revisions
→Questions & Answers
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
'''[[User:Deimidis| Guillermo Movia (deimidis)]]'''<br> | '''[[User:Deimidis| Guillermo Movia (deimidis)]]'''<br> | ||
What is the reaction of others teachers from the same institution that don't share the «open» idea? And what happen with the students after this courses having to come back to others type of sharing material. | What is the reaction of others teachers from the same institution that don't share the «open» idea? And what happen with the students after this courses having to come back to others type of sharing material. | ||
'''[[User:Bitdepth| Chris Campbell (Bitdepth)]]'''<br> | |||
Is is just about content? | |||
Do you need to strike a balance between materials and community? | |||
How important are the constraints of time and space to allow for reflection and connection and community and what role do those who have gone through the process have as the second, third or other iterations of the course happen? | |||
While the first time a course is offerred a blank slate exists, what happens when material builds over time. How much more is there than content and how does that relate to the community. A course (and learners) evolve over time, so the experience and resources become much more valuable as they evolve and can we keep people connected when the time is up and connect them with those who are there without it being overwhelming to see hundreds or thousands of people and page and links when they first arrive. I think of a real-world analogy of attending a course that is has been running for a while and having everyone who took the course before in a room, available for discussion and assistance. But seeing that room full of people could be intimidating, so how can that large group seem smaller and more personal? | |||