564
edits
User:Ddahl: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Places Observations
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
6. How well could have the Places original patch(es) been reviewed? I understand it was a huge patch, and no doubt difficult to review comprehensively. | 6. How well could have the Places original patch(es) been reviewed? I understand it was a huge patch, and no doubt difficult to review comprehensively. | ||
* Places routinely has ~1400 bugs in bugzilla. Really? This is a reflection of the complexity. | * Places routinely has ~1400 bugs in bugzilla. Really? This is a reflection of the complexity. | ||
7. When I interviewed at Mozilla, I was asked what I would like to do with Firefox. My best answer was that I wasn't sure yet, but because I have always been interested in bookmarking and online research (see rCache.com), I would like to know how I got to a particular URL, what was discovered on the way there and how I can easily get back later on without too much trouble. Almost like an analysis (think apache log analysis or perhaps a quasi data mining ) toolkit for your browsing. Our current schema would have trouble in supporting this kind of application. | 7. When I interviewed at Mozilla, I was asked what I would like to do with Firefox. My best answer was that I wasn't sure yet, but because I have always been interested in bookmarking and online research (see rCache.com), I would like to know how I got to a particular URL, what was discovered on the way there and how I can easily get back later on without too much trouble. Almost like an analysis (think apache log analysis or perhaps a quasi data mining ) toolkit for your browsing. Our current schema would have trouble in supporting this kind of application. | ||