Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925
edits
GovernanceIssues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
This is a list of open Mozilla community governance issues that Gerv may be attempting to resolve. | |||
We have a page listing [http://www.mozilla.org/about/policies/ existing policies] (may need updating). | |||
==Open Issues== | ==Open Issues== | ||
===Non-Code Modules=== | ===Non-Code ("Activities") Modules=== | ||
Whether we need any more modules of this sort, and who might own them. Work out what makes a good module, and who makes a good module owner. Mark says: make sure it's not just a mirror of Mozilla staffing structure, and not just an addition to a job title. Examples: SFX, mozilla.org (content vs. technical split?). | |||
Also contains the question of whether we need to separate policy creation and implementation. | Also contains the question of whether we need to separate policy creation and implementation. | ||
* | * [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Module_Owners_Activities_Modules List of existing Activities Modules] | ||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/208ee06876dc8517# Discussion thread on the "Policies" activities module] | |||
Next Steps: create list of possible additional modules. | |||
===Commit Access Policies: Dormant Accounts=== | ===Commit Access Policies: Dormant Accounts=== | ||
| Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
Which policies apply to which repositories? Do we want to harmonise? | Which policies apply to which repositories? Do we want to harmonise? | ||
* Initial email from Mitchell | |||
* [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Commit_Policy:Current_Procedures reed's long list of what happens now] | * [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Commit_Policy:Current_Procedures reed's long list of what happens now] | ||
Next Steps: | Next Steps: work with reed to make sure the list is complete. Read it carefully and make a proposal. | ||
===Other Module Ownership Issues=== | ===Other Module Ownership Issues=== | ||
| Line 43: | Line 48: | ||
* [http://www.mozilla.org/owners.html Current, despot-generated list] | * [http://www.mozilla.org/owners.html Current, despot-generated list] | ||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/86e8bc621062a8b6# Module Owners List Action Plan] from mitchell (July 2008 :-( - some objections were raised) | |||
Next Steps: get consensus on switching list format. (dmose very much in favour.) | Next Steps: reconsider objections raised. Try and get consensus on switching list format. (dmose very much in favour.) | ||
===Stale Reviews=== | ===Stale Reviews=== | ||