Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
===Commit Access Policies: Harmonization=== | ===Commit Access Policies: Harmonization=== | ||
Which policies apply to which repositories? Do we want to | Which policies apply to which repositories? Do we want to harmonize and make consistent? Is access repo-specific or do some accesses imply other ones? | ||
* Initial email from Mitchell | * Initial email from Mitchell | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Next Steps: work with reed to make sure the list is complete. Read it carefully and make a proposal. | Next Steps: work with reed to make sure the list is complete. Read it carefully and make a proposal. | ||
===Governance Community=== | |||
The community of people discussing governance issues itself could do with broadening and expanding. Too often, those most affected by governance decisions do not take part in the formulation of policy. Why is this? | |||
===Other Module Ownership Issues=== | ===Other Module Ownership Issues=== |