canmove, Confirmed users
455
edits
Shorlander (talk | contribs) |
Shorlander (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
*'''Lack Tactile Look & Feel:''' The current use of buttonless glyphs and traditional icons leaves Firefox feeling a little flat. Glyphs combined with buttons that have depth are inviting. Throw in a nice pressed state and they are buttons that want to be pressed. (see OS X, Chrome, Safari) | *'''Lack Tactile Look & Feel:''' The current use of buttonless glyphs and traditional icons leaves Firefox feeling a little flat. Glyphs combined with buttons that have depth are inviting. Throw in a nice pressed state and they are buttons that want to be pressed. (see OS X, Chrome, Safari) | ||
*'''Cross Platform Divergence is too Great:''' In an effort to push for platform integration it is possible that Firefox's visual look and feel has diverged too much. Even within Windows versions there can be fairly drastic differences. It is possible to achieve platform integration while maintaining the "Spirit" of the platform but also experimenting and "bending the rules". | |||
= Visually Appealing Windows Applications = | = Visually Appealing Windows Applications = |