Confirmed users
729
edits
Talk:Firefox:2.0 Product Planning:Draft Plan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Firefox:2.0 Product Planning:Draft Plan (view source)
Revision as of 06:44, 2 January 2006
, 2 January 2006no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
* [[User:chiklit|chiklit]]: This has probably been said tons of times but it would be nice to see a reduction in memory usage in Firefox 2.0. Just in viewing this page with no other tabs open FF is using nearly 50mb of memory, while the same page on IE or Opera uses nearly half that. | * [[User:chiklit|chiklit]]: This has probably been said tons of times but it would be nice to see a reduction in memory usage in Firefox 2.0. Just in viewing this page with no other tabs open FF is using nearly 50mb of memory, while the same page on IE or Opera uses nearly half that. | ||
= Anti-phishing as default plugin not permanent feature = | |||
I want to propose that features such as Anti-phishing is added as a default plugin that can be removed as any other plugin. Whereas I am totally for having Anti-phishing pre-installed in a new Firefox install, I see it as a major problem if we don't make it easy to disable or remove the function. | I want to propose that features such as Anti-phishing is added as a default plugin that can be removed as any other plugin. Whereas I am totally for having Anti-phishing pre-installed in a new Firefox install, I see it as a major problem if we don't make it easy to disable or remove the function. | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
Firefox aims be lean and mean, and as such should not have too many integral parts. Default plugins rather than built-in features should therefore be preferred. | Firefox aims be lean and mean, and as such should not have too many integral parts. Default plugins rather than built-in features should therefore be preferred. | ||
= Access key combinations defined within role list = | |||
Access Keys in web pages have been shown to conflict with pre-defined access keys in Browsers as well as Operating Systems. | Access Keys in web pages have been shown to conflict with pre-defined access keys in Browsers as well as Operating Systems. | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
How it is thought is that there will be a huge list of Roles whereas most does not associate with a key combination. Only typically used Roles would be pre-set such as Alt-B for Bookmarks, etc. The role list would however contain possible access key combinations from Firefox Plugins as well as Firefox internal, and user custom choices like adding frequently used web-pages to the role list and associate it with a key-press combination. | How it is thought is that there will be a huge list of Roles whereas most does not associate with a key combination. Only typically used Roles would be pre-set such as Alt-B for Bookmarks, etc. The role list would however contain possible access key combinations from Firefox Plugins as well as Firefox internal, and user custom choices like adding frequently used web-pages to the role list and associate it with a key-press combination. | ||
=MNG support= | |||
Is this planned for 2.0? We already know there are 1000+ people asking for it. [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] 14:26, 30 Dec 2005 (PST) | Is this planned for 2.0? We already know there are 1000+ people asking for it. [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] 14:26, 30 Dec 2005 (PST) | ||