JavaScript:SpiderMonkey:GC Futures: Difference between revisions

Line 28: Line 28:
** Need write barrier, efficient auto-temp-value rooting [bug NNNNNNN]
** Need write barrier, efficient auto-temp-value rooting [bug NNNNNNN]
** No naked argv[i] writes [bug NNNNNNN]
** No naked argv[i] writes [bug NNNNNNN]
** Conservative stack scanning to avoid temp-value rooting overheads? [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516832|bug 516832]
** Conservative stack scanning to avoid temp-value rooting overheads? [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516832 bug 516832]
*** Andreas and Brendan think this is likely best (safety, clean code)
*** Andreas and Brendan think this is likely best (safety, clean code)
*** Equivalent to well-used (i.e. seldom-used) pinning API in effect but contained:
*** Equivalent to well-used (i.e. seldom-used) pinning API in effect but contained:
Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
419

edits