Talk:Session Restore: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 31: Line 31:
Agree 100%!  I came to SessionSaver for the crash recovery, but stayed for the non-crash session saving.  It's incredibly useful when having to reboot your OS (e.g. because you installed a new piece of software, or applied OS or third-party software patches), or when having to shut down your laptop because you're on the go, to be able to save your work in Firefox the same way you can in document-oriented software applications, and be able to pick right back up where you left off after you've restarted and logged back in.  It would be silly not to implement this and would just mean lots of people would be forcibly killing their own browsers in order to save their sessions.
Agree 100%!  I came to SessionSaver for the crash recovery, but stayed for the non-crash session saving.  It's incredibly useful when having to reboot your OS (e.g. because you installed a new piece of software, or applied OS or third-party software patches), or when having to shut down your laptop because you're on the go, to be able to save your work in Firefox the same way you can in document-oriented software applications, and be able to pick right back up where you left off after you've restarted and logged back in.  It would be silly not to implement this and would just mean lots of people would be forcibly killing their own browsers in order to save their sessions.


- Dan Harkless
-- [[User:Dan_Harkless|Dan Harkless]], 23:17, 16 Feb 2006 (PST)


== DOM restore vs. URL restore ==
== DOM restore vs. URL restore ==

Navigation menu