AMO:Editors/MeetingNotes: Difference between revisions

* Attendees

** Nick Nguyen (Mozilla)

** Jorge Villalobos (Mozilla)

** Rey Bango (Mozilla)

** Zadkiel

** Andrew Williamson

** Andreas Wagner

** Adam Green

** Teun van Eijsden

** Shivanand Sharma

** Archaeopteryx

* Queue status and new editor weekly report.

** Editor focus on nominations is working well.

** Focus back on updates eventually. Rey: rotating queues schedules for editors in order to distribute work properly.

** Bring super-review escalation to a minimum.

* Review process redesign overview. http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcxw3w5k_25hn9nd8vg

* Suggestions from editors on how to improve the system.

** Request more descriptive information from authors, specially regarding expected behavior

** Screenshots showing differences in add-on.

** Allow uploading updates when in nomination queue without bumping the add-on to the back of the line.

** Improve validation tools to detect lack of namespacing.

** Diff for nominations https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498072

** Separating themes and search engines from main queues. Rey: you can sort the queues by type in the editor tools.

** More editors.

** Make the validation tool more verbose about its flags.

** Author checklist before submission.

** Inspire Confidence in new editors

** Categorize the addons queue by the level of expertise required for reviews

** Queue rotation. Monthly / bi-monthly.

** Sandbox after info request and no response? 1 week, maybe?

** Add-on update/nomination feed.

** Editor comments -> not used much

** Private editor mailing list.

* Feedback on call -> very good. The meeting was long and very productive, but the frequency shouldn't be too high to prevent having the meetings become meaningless.