Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925
edits
GovernanceIssues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
This is a list of open Mozilla community governance issues | This is a list of open Mozilla community governance issues. | ||
We have a page listing [http://www.mozilla.org/about/policies/ existing policies] | We also have a page listing [http://www.mozilla.org/about/policies/ existing policies]. | ||
==Open Issues== | ==Open Issues== | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
===Monday Meeting=== | ===Monday Meeting=== | ||
Issue: Clarify the purpose of the meeting, and determine whether the current timing is optimal. | Issue: the Monday meeting is having an identity crisis. Clarify the purpose and most useful content of the meeting, and determine whether the current timing is optimal. | ||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/68685672ffb76f6b/37cf986d3962a47 thread in mozilla.dev.planning on moving the meeting time] | * [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/68685672ffb76f6b/37cf986d3962a47 thread in mozilla.dev.planning on moving the meeting time] | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/msg/89fa03e13375ae9f dria's summary of the meeting's purpose] | * [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/msg/89fa03e13375ae9f dria's summary of the meeting's purpose] | ||
So Far: Timing has been | So Far: Timing has been changed. Gerv has had discussions with surman and beltzner about possible improvements to content and format. | ||
Next Steps: Gerv is working on a proposal for change. | Next Steps: Gerv is working on a proposal for change. | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
Issue: Mozilla runs a large number of mailing lists, as well as our public [http://www.mozilla.org/community/developer-forums.html discussion forums]. We should audit that list to make sure no project discussion is private when it should be (at least) read-only public. | Issue: Mozilla runs a large number of mailing lists, as well as our public [http://www.mozilla.org/community/developer-forums.html discussion forums]. We should audit that list to make sure no project discussion is private when it should be (at least) read-only public. | ||
So Far: | So Far: Gerv wrote a small script to extract a list of possibly-concerning mailing lists from mailman. He has had several iterations of the list from mzeier, refining the script each time. | ||
Next Steps: contact the owners of possibly-concerning lists, and ask them politely about the purpose of their list and whether public would be a better option. | |||
==Proposed== | ==Proposed== | ||