6
edits
XUL:Xul Runner Versioning: Difference between revisions
replica - extentions
Peter Wilson (talk | contribs) |
(replica - extentions) |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
anywhere, while still installing the app as a native app would be installed. | anywhere, while still installing the app as a native app would be installed. | ||
--[[User:Darin|Darin]] 14:47, 19 Dec 2004 (PST) | --[[User:Darin|Darin]] 14:47, 19 Dec 2004 (PST) | ||
:There are another important advantage of installing XULRunner application, ever if it's only XUL+JS - ability to install extentions. If you are running directly from .xulapp archive it's impossible to use current model of application-wide (not user-wide) extention installing. [[User:MichaelDubner|MichaelDubner]] 12:26, 9 Feb 2006 (PST) | |||
I don't think it is a good idea to use the .xulapp extension. I am already running a project at http://xulapp.mozdev.org to create an FF IDE. I already use this extension for configuration files. | I don't think it is a good idea to use the .xulapp extension. I am already running a project at http://xulapp.mozdev.org to create an FF IDE. I already use this extension for configuration files. | ||
I withdraw this objection. It appears that XulRunner will be perfect for the XulApp IDE. In fact, XulApp may serve as the application builder your plans reference. I would like to get in touch with an XulRunner developer. Please email me at pwilson@gorge.net I believe we will find some common interest. | I withdraw this objection. It appears that XulRunner will be perfect for the XulApp IDE. In fact, XulApp may serve as the application builder your plans reference. I would like to get in touch with an XulRunner developer. Please email me at pwilson@gorge.net I believe we will find some common interest. | ||