Confirmed users
9,624
edits
Drumbeat/WeeklyUpdates/Feb-08-2010: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Drumbeat/WeeklyUpdates/Feb-08-2010 (view source)
Revision as of 17:04, 8 February 2010
, 8 February 2010→Meeting Notes
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
give right construct or direction to community | give right construct or direction to community | ||
threaded commenting: mostly about a dialogue between the crowd and the person who submitted their idea | |||
successful project: | |||
"mob for hire" | |||
successful business | |||
a lot of people found others that they started businesses with and form friendships with | |||
the idea of crowdsourcing is overwhelming for many people | |||
hand-holding along the way | |||
breaking into smaller tasks / milestones | |||
different methods of recognition are important | |||
they ran a weekly community blog | |||
video discussion of ideas submitted that week | |||
what was best ideas, etc. | |||
live critique of ideas, etc. | |||
drove a TON of community participation | |||
Q: Do you always award points for any participation? | |||
Had a point system for participation points, glory points, royalty points, and exchange of currency between members | |||
always award points for any type of participation between members | |||
main way to get glory | |||
different things motivate different people, and different levels of commitment | |||
Q: When you set up, did you look at motivations? | |||
First started, were just interested in awarding people money | |||
Started several different projects (like "greedy or needy") purely motivated by recognition types | |||
Took a while to figure out. Looked closely at gaming theory. | |||