Firefox2/StatusMeetings/2006-04-11: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
= Bon Echo Alpha 2 =
= Bon Echo Alpha 2 =
* proposed release for May 9th, code freeze for May 5th
* proposed release for May 9th, code freeze for May 5th
** ben: should we talk about this in context of A3?
*** beltzner: I don't think whether or not we do A3 should affect A2's date
*** shaver: I think it might; if we do an A3 it might slip or slide the A2 content
* tracking [[Firefox2/Requirements|against requirements]]
* tracking [[Firefox2/Requirements|against requirements]]
* ''shaver/brendan to discuss what platform pieces are being targetted''
** rstrong: extension locales might not make it
* ''any other release-related issues to start tracking? update channels?''
** shaver: need timelines for offline storage, timer loop stuff
** ben: session restore is there but need to watch Tp/Ts
** ben: places needs to consider an A3 to be feature complete
** ben: RSS UI will probably not make an A2
** bsmedberg: new installer will require some release/build engineering time to get things working properly
* what platform pieces are being targetted?
** shaver: event loop pieces, canvas context stuff (maybe, vlad's overburdened with timer fixes and offline storage as well)


= Developer Roundtable =
= Developer Roundtable =
Line 40: Line 49:


=== Bookmarks and History: Places ===
=== Bookmarks and History: Places ===
 
* Making good progress:
Making good progress:
** 58 a2 issues open... annie 14 brettw 14 ben 10 joe 13 pam 3  
 
** annie 19 brettw 13.5 beng 16 joe 15
- 58 a2 issues open... annie 14 brettw 14 ben 10 joe 13 pam 3  
** focusing on feature complete & major "functionality broken" bugs.
- annie 19 brettw 13.5 beng 16 joe 15
* schrep: what's a user with A2 going to see difference-wise from A1 in terms of places
- focusing on feature complete & major "functionality broken" bugs.
** ben: some new functionality, better performance, the UI polish in terms of presentation might not be there; how's search gonna be?


=== User Experience: Tabbed Browsing ===
=== User Experience: Tabbed Browsing ===
''mconnor to fill this bit in''
* myk: how's the new browsermessage stuff?
** mconnor: first review is done, it's pretty cool, gonna get enn to do a second pass on that


=== User Experience: Session Restore ===
=== User Experience: Session Restore ===
* Patch available for testing at [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328162 bug 328162]
* Patch available for testing at [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328162 bug 328162]
* Currently working on fixing Ts regression
* Currently working on fixing Ts regression


=== User Experience: Spell Check ===
=== User Experience: Spell Check ===
* a few pieces of work yet to be done; might increase file size
* '''action:''' brettw to file bugs and get them targetted at A2


=== User Experience: Microsummaries ===
=== User Experience: Microsummaries ===
 
* Landed first patch: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333052 bug 333052], which makes the bookmarks toolbar observe the "bookmarks/generatedTitle" annotation.  When the microsummary service sets or updates that annotation for a particular bookmark, the toolbar now uses the content of the annotation as the bookmark's label.
Landed first patch: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333052 bug 333052], which makes the bookmarks toolbar observe the "bookmarks/generatedTitle" annotation.  When the microsummary service sets or updates that annotation for a particular bookmark, the toolbar now uses the content of the annotation as the bookmark's label.
* Currently working on patch implementing microsummary service.
 
Currently working on patch implementing microsummary service.


=== Feeds: Parser ===
=== Feeds: Parser ===
 
* Robert sayrer needs to address peterv review feedback and get sr asap.
Robert sayrer needs to address peterv review feedback and get sr asap.
* Needs to complete feed parser js component (beng reviewing)
 
* '''action:''' mconnor to speed SR for this piece
Needs to complete feed parser js component (beng reviewing)


=== Feeds: UI ===
=== Feeds: UI ===
 
* Blocked by prereq (feed parser)
Blocked by prereq (feed parser)


=== Extension Manager: UI ===
=== Extension Manager: UI ===
Line 77: Line 86:


=== Extension Manager: Locale Packs ===
=== Extension Manager: Locale Packs ===
* might not make A2


=== Search: UI ===
=== Search: UI ===
* Search engine manager patch to be submitted this week
* Search engine manager patch to be submitted this week
** ben and beltzner brought up a few things that gavin didn't have on his radar
** '''action:''' beltzner to file bug about moving the search drop-down selector to the right hand side of the search bar
** Got sidetracked by some 1.0.8 regressions
** Got sidetracked by some 1.0.8 regressions


=== Search: Plugin Format ===
=== Search: Plugin Format ===
*Little bug fixes and cleanup has been reviewed and will land soon
* Little bug fixes and cleanup has been reviewed and will land soon
*Format changes delayed until b1
* Format changes delayed until b1


=== Distribution: Installer ===
=== Distribution: Installer ===
Line 91: Line 103:


=== Distribution: Channel Support ===
=== Distribution: Channel Support ===
* darin: anything


=== Infrastructure: Performance ===
=== Infrastructure: Performance ===
* Are there SVG performance improvement opportunities for Fx2?  Starting to get pokes from people building SVG-heavy applications (mapping), etc. about timeline for improvements (Fx2 vs Fx3).
* Are there SVG performance improvement opportunities for Fx2?  Starting to get pokes from people building SVG-heavy applications (mapping), etc. about timeline for improvements (Fx2 vs Fx3).
* Did the compiler-switch conversation happen offline?
* Did the compiler-switch conversation happen offline?


=== Infrastructure: Platform Uplift ===
=== Infrastructure: Platform Uplift ===
* JS 1.7 to arrive by end of April ("or bust" per Brendan): generators, iterators,  array comprehensions, let, block scope, destructuring assignment
* JS 1.7 to arrive by end of April ("or bust" per Brendan): generators, iterators,  array comprehensions, let, block scope, destructuring assignment
* Canvas interface and optimizations ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333177 bug 333177]): vlad needs to decide to land them on trunk first for baking prior to a2.  Would be good to get 1.8+patch experimental builds up somewhere for canvas-developers to test.
* Canvas interface and optimizations ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333177 bug 333177]): vlad needs to decide to land them on trunk first for baking prior to a2.  Would be good to get 1.8+patch experimental builds up somewhere for canvas-developers to test.
Line 107: Line 117:
* shaver: still concerned about getting the right hooks in place for extensions, esp. WRT Places, Session Saver, and notification area (if it happens).
* shaver: still concerned about getting the right hooks in place for extensions, esp. WRT Places, Session Saver, and notification area (if it happens).
* 1.8.1 nomination triage meeting: is it scheduled?
* 1.8.1 nomination triage meeting: is it scheduled?
** schrep: yes, we should just schedule it - you want to do a first pass and target that at the end of this week?
** shaver: I'll do the first pass if you schedule the meeting


=== Infrastructure: Instrumentation ===
=== Infrastructure: Instrumentation ===
Line 117: Line 129:


= Other Business =
= Other Business =
=== Alpha 3 ===
* ben: I've been moving bugs to B1 which would probably be good to fix before the beta cycle; they're not new features, but they'd be useful to get before alpha
* schrep: that would push us into September for the schedule; if it's completing what we currently have planned, that's one thing, but if it's jamming a bunch of new stuff in there, that's a different issue.
* ben: some of the work on the UI hasn't started yet (not even talking about tags) and in my experience the UI polish work often leads to new bugs
* ??: I thought the approach of evaluating whether or not an A3 as we come up to A2 deadline was the best one to take; minimizes risk and slip
* mconnor: afraid that if we add an A3, we'll end up with longer cycles in beta, and we'll end up adding more features and just delaying ship even further
* myk: there's uncertainty with uSummaries, too, especially in terms of the available review resources
* schrep: what would you be able to do differently now knowing that there might be an alpha3?
** ben: I'd be able to prioritize work more accurately; it wouldn't change the work that people are doing today
* consensus was to push towards A2 and re-evaluate closer to ship
Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
3,599

edits

Navigation menu