User:Broccauley/Fixing TabCandy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Some Ranting: less waffle
(→‎So what exactly is wrong with "TabCandy"?: The "Mac" stuff takes the focus away from the core-problem of not just using a simple window to group)
(→‎Some Ranting: less waffle)
Line 5: Line 5:
Over the past few weeks I've been trying to integrate TabCandy into my daily browsing. Here's my verdict: overall I think TabCandy is a great idea to solve a definite problem, and has a LOT of potential, but unfortunately its present implementation is not ready for prime-time; IMO it's odd, non-logical, over-complicated, frustrating to use, non-consistent with existing window management paradigms, actually makes me ''less'' productive, and is dangerous. Yes, ''dangerous'' - once you let this mess of a monster out in its current form (spouting its own new tab-management paradigms) it will be difficult to get it back in its cage. Therefore, I'd rather Mozilla thought about all the available options much more carefully before this officially becomes part of Firefox proper.
Over the past few weeks I've been trying to integrate TabCandy into my daily browsing. Here's my verdict: overall I think TabCandy is a great idea to solve a definite problem, and has a LOT of potential, but unfortunately its present implementation is not ready for prime-time; IMO it's odd, non-logical, over-complicated, frustrating to use, non-consistent with existing window management paradigms, actually makes me ''less'' productive, and is dangerous. Yes, ''dangerous'' - once you let this mess of a monster out in its current form (spouting its own new tab-management paradigms) it will be difficult to get it back in its cage. Therefore, I'd rather Mozilla thought about all the available options much more carefully before this officially becomes part of Firefox proper.


Why did I open this post with launching what might appear as a very scathing attack? Well, let me re-emphasise how I recognise that there is a ''VERY'' good idea in here - unfortunately, it just isn't going to reach its potential in this current form - that would be such a shame, and imperfection like this really annoys me! :)
Why did I open this post with launching what might appear as a very scathing attack? Well, let me re-emphasise how I recognise that there is a ''VERY'' good idea in here and a *very* nice interface - unfortunately, I feel there is a severe logical flaw in its current form - that would be such a shame, as lost potential like this really annoys me! :)


= So what exactly is wrong with "TabCandy"?  =
= So what exactly is wrong with "TabCandy"?  =
669

edits

Navigation menu