User talk:Standard8: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Driving bugs: formatting)
Line 4: Line 4:


{| border=1 valign=top
{| border=1 valign=top
! From !! To !! Copy? !! Move? !! Reason/Notes
! From !! To !! Copy? !! Move? !! Complete? !!Reason/Notes
|-
|-
| anything || same place || No || No || Don't really want to be able to create duplicates in this way.
| anything || same place || No || No || || Don't really want to be able to create duplicates in this way.
|-
|-
| card in ML || Parent ML || No || No || ditto
| card in ML || Parent ML || No || No || || ditto
|-
|-
| anything || read only directory || No || No ||
| anything || read only directory || No || No || Yes ||
|-
|-
| mailing list || mailing list || No || No || We don't support nested mailing lists at the moment ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40301 bug 40301])
| mailing list || mailing list || No || No || || We don't support nested mailing lists at the moment ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40301 bug 40301])
|-
|-
| card || different AB || Yes || Yes ||
| card || different AB || Yes || Yes || ||
|-
|-
| card || mailing list || Yes || No || Cards currently have to exist outside a mailing list for the mailing list to work correctly.
| card || mailing list || Yes || No || || Cards currently have to exist outside a mailing list for the mailing list to work correctly.
|-
|-
| mailing list || different AB || No || Yes || We require mailing lists to have unique names. Otherwise composition would get confusing.
| mailing list || different AB || No || Yes || || We require mailing lists to have unique names. Otherwise composition would get confusing.
|-
|-
| card in ML || other ML || Yes || Yes ||
| card in ML || other ML || Yes || Yes || ||
|-
|-
| card in ML || other AB || Yes || Yes ||
| card in ML || other AB || Yes || Yes || ||
|-
|-
| read-only directory item || anywhere || Yes || No || Can't "move" read-only items.
| read-only directory item || anywhere || Yes || No || Patch 1 || Can't "move" read-only items.
|}
|}


Some other thoughts/concerns:
Some other thoughts/concerns:


* DnD code doesn't currently support re-checking for only move or copy allowed - assumes both. Should be an easy fix.
* DnD code doesn't currently support re-checking for only move or copy allowed - assumes both. Should be an easy fix (bug 336241).
* In cases of card->mailing list and read-only item-> anywhere, "copy" should be the default action. In other cases I think it should be move. I think this can be done within the limits of the existing code.
* In cases of card->mailing list and read-only item-> anywhere, "copy" should be the default action. In other cases I think it should be move. I think this can be done within the limits of the existing code.


canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
3,627

edits

Navigation menu