3
edits
Feed Handling:User Interface: Difference between revisions
→User Comments
Saqu ettair (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
* Actually I find this discussion and development strange, just because Safari introduced the pretty lay-outed RSS-feeds and IE7 took this feature in, doesn't mean Firefox should do it the same way. Personally I prefer the way Opera 9 beta handles it. In Opera, RSS-feeds are opened in a complete feed reader similar to the one in Thunderbird, but within the browser. It allows also to delete and comment the feed items and gives you the choice of representing the website or the abstract. The live bookmarks could function thus as a kind of inbox.--[[User:Saqu_ettair|Ludovic Janssens]] 09:34, 17 May 2006 (CEST) | * Actually I find this discussion and development strange, just because Safari introduced the pretty lay-outed RSS-feeds and IE7 took this feature in, doesn't mean Firefox should do it the same way. Personally I prefer the way Opera 9 beta handles it. In Opera, RSS-feeds are opened in a complete feed reader similar to the one in Thunderbird, but within the browser. It allows also to delete and comment the feed items and gives you the choice of representing the website or the abstract. The live bookmarks could function thus as a kind of inbox.--[[User:Saqu_ettair|Ludovic Janssens]] 09:34, 17 May 2006 (CEST) | ||
* Given the existence of RSS aggregator extensions (http://sage.mozdev.org/ for example) I wonder if consideration could be given to an option which disabled the updating of Live Bookmarks? Sage allows finer control over the update of feeds, and the large number of them I've accumulated do not get automatically updated on start-up, but Live Bookmarks from the Firefox side do. Currently, using dial-up, this results in about 2MB of download and sluggish peformance for the first couple of minutes of use. An option to control Firefox's treatment of Live Bookmarks would be a god-send. [[User:HamishMacEwan|HamishMacEwan]] 14:11, 6 June 2006 (PDT) | |||