User:GijsKruitbosch/JS Debugging/Tasks: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Importance-ordered Task List ==
== Notes ==
A small note about this list: importance != working order, given that some of these items need other items, and that some require back-end changes which will need to happen fast, if at all, on the 1.8.1 branch (which is what I'm trying to cater to).
importance != working order, given that some of these items need other items, and that some require back-end changes which will need to happen fast, if at all, on the 1.8.1 branch (which is what I'm trying to cater to).


'''Front end work is (mostly) being done on: Firebug'''
'''Front end work is (mostly) being done on: Firebug'''
== Status Summary ==
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td>'''Total'''</td>
<td>'''Fixed'''</td>
<td>'''Patch done'''</td>
<td>'''WFM'''</td>
<td>'''WONTFIX'''</td>
<td>Open</td>
<td>Other</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>23</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
</table>
== Task list ==
     <table border="1">
     <table border="1">
<tr>
<tr>
Line 24: Line 47:
             <td>No</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>Patch</td>
             <td>[http://gijs.codingo.org/mozilla/soc/results/patchBreakpoints.txt Patch]</td>


         </tr>
         </tr>
Line 32: Line 55:
             <td>No</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>Patch</td>
             <td>[http://gijs.codingo.org/mozilla/soc/results/patchWatches.txt Patch]</td>


         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
             <td>3</td>
             <td>3</td>
             <td>Make the originating document accessible from any error in the console</td>
             <td>Make the originating document accessible for a JS error in the console</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>None</td>
             <td>None</td>
             <td>Patch</td>
             <td>FIXED</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 47: Line 70:
             <td>No</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>None</td>
             <td>None</td>
             <td>Patch</td>
             <td>FIXED</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 75: Line 98:
         <tr>
         <tr>
             <td>8</td>
             <td>8</td>
             <td>Venkman should try to load line-maps lazily (on-demand, and not demand them immediately like it does now).</td>
             <td>Venkman is too eager with __toplevel__ script linemaps</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>{{bug|341758}}</td>
             <td>{{bug|341758}}</td>


             <td>None yet</td>
             <td>FIXED</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 87: Line 110:
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>


             <td>Patch</td>
             <td>[http://gijs.codingo.org/mozilla/soc/results/patchWatches.txt Patch]</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 95: Line 118:
             <td>No</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>None yet</td>
             <td>[http://gijs.codingo.org/mozilla/soc/results/patchBreakpoints.txt Patch]</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 108: Line 131:
             <td>12</td>
             <td>12</td>
             <td>Anonymous functions should not be lumped together in profiling.</td>
             <td>Anonymous functions should not be lumped together in profiling.</td>
             <td>Presumably not</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>{{bug|347888}}</td>
             <td>{{bug|347888}}</td>
             <td>Understand problem, fix wanted</td>
             <td>FIXED</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 140: Line 163:
             <td>Yes?</td>
             <td>Yes?</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>None yet</td>
             <td>None</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 147: Line 170:
             <td>Yes</td>
             <td>Yes</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>Is Hewitt fixing this himself?</td>
             <td>None</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 154: Line 177:
             <td>Yes?</td>
             <td>Yes?</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>None yet</td>
             <td>None</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 168: Line 191:
             <td>No, hopefully.</td>
             <td>No, hopefully.</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>None yet</td>
             <td>None</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
         <tr>
         <tr>
Line 175: Line 198:
             <td>No</td>
             <td>No</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>-</td>
             <td>None yet</td>
             <td>None</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>22</td>
            <td>Open Windows view misconstructs base URL</td>
            <td>No</td>
            <td>{{bug|349066}}</td>
            <td>FIXED</td>
         </tr>
         </tr>
     </table>
     </table>
Confirmed users
290

edits

Navigation menu