canmove, Confirmed users
570
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== | {| class="fullwidth-table" | ||
|- | |||
| style="font-weight: bold; background: #DDD;" | Feature | |||
| style="font-weight: bold; background: #DDD;" | Status | |||
| style="font-weight: bold; background: #DDD;" | ETA | |||
| style="font-weight: bold; background: #DDD;" | Owner | |||
|- | |||
<section begin="status" /> | |||
| [[Feature Page Structure]] | |||
| {{StatusHealthy|status=Channel switcher removed, identifying participants & priority for this.}} | |||
| N/A | |||
| Alex Limi | |||
<section end="status" /> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== Summary == | |||
Succinct summary of the feature. | |||
== Team == | |||
Who's working on this? | |||
* '''Feature Manager''': Alex Limi | |||
* '''Lead Developer''': | |||
* '''QA''': Juan Becerra | |||
* '''UX''': Alex Limi | |||
=== Overview === | |||
The user that wants to suddenly switch his stable version of Firefox to Beta or Aurora doesn't really exist. I think the channel switcher has great value as a '''discovery mechanism''', but that doesn't mean we should replace the Firefox they're currently using with something else from under their feet. | |||
Instead, I want us to move to a model where the channels are self-contained and standalone, and use Firefox Sync to bring over the data if people want it to be available. | Instead, I want us to move to a model where the channels are self-contained and standalone, and use Firefox Sync to bring over the data if people want it to be available. |