Talk:WebAPI/WebTelephony: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
== philikon's thoughts ==
== philikon's thoughts ==


* IMHO
* IMHO <code>navigator.telephony.dial("numbergoeshere");</code> is nicer than <code>new TelephonyCall("numbergoeshere");</code>
 
  var call = navigator.telephony.dial("numbergoeshere");
 
is nicer than
 
  var call = new TelephonyCall("numbergoeshere");
 
* We have a bunch of telephony-related functionality that's not reflected yet:
* We have a bunch of telephony-related functionality that's not reflected yet:
** controlling and reading radio power
** controlling and reading radio power
** reading radio metadata (operator, signal strength, etc.)
** reading radio metadata (operator, signal strength, etc.)
** ...
** ...
* I would also suggest another readyState, <code>"dialing"</code> that comes before <code>"calling"</code> for outgoing calls.
* Nits: we should probably define the possible values for readyState on the interface (nit: for XHR they're ints, not strings... I like being consistent, but I also prefers strings... hmmm...). Also, event listener objects should probably be declared as <code>EventListener</code>.


My proposal on this (as a delta to the main proposal):
My proposal on this (as a delta to the main proposal):
Line 54: Line 49:
   interface Telephony {
   interface Telephony {
     void power(bool on);
     void power(bool on);
 
    Some thoughts on this:
     TelephonyCall dial(String number);
     TelephonyCall dial(String number);
 
   
     EventListener onpowerchange
     EventListener onpowerchange
     EventListener onsignalstrengthchange
     EventListener onsignalstrengthchange
     EventListener onoperatorchange
     EventListener onoperatorchange
   }
   }
canmove, Confirmed users
725

edits

Navigation menu