|
|
Line 40: |
Line 40: |
|
| |
|
| == Roundtable == | | == Roundtable == |
|
| |
| My (jhammel) priorities are to get bug 738478 unblocked so I can work
| |
| on jetperf (first bug 729205)
| |
|
| |
| Issues:
| |
|
| |
| * What to do about PerfConfigurator options?
| |
| ** --perfconfigurator_options -a,ts,-e,`which firefox`,--result_url,file://...
| |
| *** would make jetperf.py difficult, e.g. results_url
| |
| ** use the options we have, make the help e.g. "--activeTests option for PerfConfigurator"
| |
| *** not very helpful
| |
| ** other ideas?
| |
|
| |
| I really want configuration that makes it easy for me (and presumedly everyone
| |
| else) to run.
| |
|
| |
| * Firefox fetching:
| |
| ** aki is taking bug 720436, looks like: https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/Mozharness/28-Mar-2012#In_Progress
| |
| ** should we block on this?
| |
|
| |
| * Dependencies: what should we do in the immediate term?
| |
| ** "pypi" on p.m.o/~jhammel/pypi ?
| |
| ** list verbosely? (e.g. using a tool to gather them?)
| |
|
| |
| * Error checking
| |
| ** I'm making it a priority to make our error checking better in Talos
| |
| ** can we land bug 738478 without listing error messages?
| |
| *** follow-up bug
| |
| *** otherwise, this might take some time while I figure out what to do here
| |
|
| |
| * Alternatively, we can have jetperf (and conceivably talos remote) not inherit from talos_script:Talos. While I think this is the wrong move, if it avoids the conflicts here maybe it is expedient.
| |
|
| |
| It is my basic belief that if this patch is better than what we have now we should take it and build on it.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Action Items == | | == Action Items == |