canmove, Confirmed users
2,675
edits
(defn, intro above toc) |
(2012-03-26 sicking tweet comparing Web Intents to XML) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
** 2011-10-07 https://plus.google.com/102034052532213921839/posts/ZSS4q9dYyGm (has specific criticisms of existing invalid made-up <g:plusone> tags, non-semantic <div>s, and a hypothetical <intent> tag) | ** 2011-10-07 https://plus.google.com/102034052532213921839/posts/ZSS4q9dYyGm (has specific criticisms of existing invalid made-up <g:plusone> tags, non-semantic <div>s, and a hypothetical <intent> tag) | ||
* 2012-02-09 [http://benlog.com/articles/2012/02/09/a-simpler-webbier-approach-to-web-intents-or-activities/ Ben Adida: a simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents (or Activities)] | * 2012-02-09 [http://benlog.com/articles/2012/02/09/a-simpler-webbier-approach-to-web-intents-or-activities/ Ben Adida: a simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents (or Activities)] | ||
* 2012-03-26 Jonas Sicking: [https://twitter.com/SickingJ/status/184345080272928768 WebIntents is the new XML. Have a problem? Just use WebIntents and it'll be solved.] | |||
* some abstract use-cases https://gist.github.com/1222633 | * some abstract use-cases https://gist.github.com/1222633 | ||