Discussion Forums/Problem Statement: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
==Current Problems==
==Current Problems==


The outsourcing is sub-optimal because Google, in particular, are not very responsive to reports of problems. As I write, much of the gatewaying to Groups is broken.
The outsourcing is sub-optimal because Google, in particular, are not very responsive to reports of problems - although things have improved in that regard in the last month. Time will tell if this improvement is lasting.


We don't have complete control of the spam problem. [[Discussion_Forums/Proposal|A proposal exists]] to make that better, but requires time from IT.  
We don't have complete control of the spam problem. [[Discussion_Forums/Proposal|A proposal exists]] to make that better, but requires time from IT which has not been available for some time now.  


Also, the gatewaying is not exactly perfect, and threading can break in some circumstances.
Also, the gatewaying is not exactly perfect, and threading can break in some circumstances. Patches to Mailman to make this problem better have been proposed.


==Possible Improvement Q & A==
==Possible Improvement Q & A==
Line 55: Line 55:
===Why can't we go mail-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.===
===Why can't we go mail-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.===


Presumably you mean mail-only with a web-based archive? Amazingly, it seems the open source community has still not managed to come up with mailing list management software with a decent web-based archiving interface. And removal of the ability to post via the web would raise the barrier to entry of discussions.
Presumably you mean mail-only with a web-based archive? Amazingly, it seems the open source community has still not managed to come up with mailing list management software with a decent web-based archiving interface. Mailman 3 looks like a possibility, but it's not there yet. And removal of the ability to post via the web would raise the barrier to entry of discussions.


===Why can't we go web-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.===
===Why can't we go web-only? One thing is much easier to maintain than three.===
Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925

edits

Navigation menu