Services/Meetings/RapidRelease/2012-04-20: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
= Clientside =
= Clientside =
== Desktop ==
== Desktop ==
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=2911739;classification=Client%20Software;chfieldto=Now;query_format=advanced;chfieldfrom=2012-03-02;bug_status=RESOLVED;bug_status=VERIFIED;bug_status=CLOSED;component=Firefox%20Sync%3A%20Backend;component=Firefox%20Sync%3A%20UI;product=Mozilla%20Services, bugs closed since rapid release]
=== Firefox 12 (going to release: 2012-04-24) ===
=== Firefox 12 (going to release: 2012-04-24) ===
* minor
=== Firefox 13 (going to beta,  release: 2012-06-05) ===
=== Firefox 13 (going to beta,  release: 2012-06-05) ===
* minor
=== Firefox 14 (going to aurora, release: 2012-07-17) ===
=== Firefox 14 (going to aurora, release: 2012-07-17) ===
* minor
=== Firefox 15+ ===
=== Firefox 15+ ===
* sync 2.0/browser id integration
* sync 2.0/browser id integration
Line 21: Line 25:
* https://wiki.mozilla.org/Services/PushTabToDevice
* https://wiki.mozilla.org/Services/PushTabToDevice
* Feature parity
* Feature parity
* Sync 2.0 and Persona integration, presumably.


== B2G ==
== B2G ==


* Sync 1.1 or Sync 2.0?
* Sync 1.1 or Sync 2.0?
* Launch date for Operational capacity planning?
** Resilient Sync is only available for Sync 2.0
* Launch date to release channel?
** Operations coordination required for launch capacity


= Serverside =
= Serverside =
Line 66: Line 73:


= Notes from the meeting =
= Notes from the meeting =
* Ops needs to do capacity testing for b2g
** and with real devices
** what the per device impact is
*** maximum # of devices (needs to know in jul/aug timeframe)
* date & plan for 2.0 still up in the air
* https://github.com/mozilla/browserid/wiki/Scaling-to-1M
* scl3 has been pushed back
* budget has not been finalized for capacity
* hoping to make a call on implementation of contacts for b2g next week
* discussion of cleartext data, and whether reconciliation of contacts should be client or server-side
** considering standardizing as much of this as possible in the client
Confirmed users
385

edits

Navigation menu