Confirmed users
561
edits
Auto-tools/Projects/B2G Test And Performance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Auto-tools/Projects/B2G Test And Performance (view source)
Revision as of 14:40, 24 August 2012
, 24 August 2012→B2G Test and Performance Automation
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Eideticker == | == Eideticker == | ||
[https://wiki.mozilla.org/Project_Eideticker Eideticker] is a video capture and analysis tool for performance analysis. It will use marionette to drive the system under test. It can also be used to do performance testing for fennec and desktop browsers as well. | [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Project_Eideticker Eideticker] is a video capture and analysis tool for performance analysis. It will use marionette to drive the system under test. It can also be used to do performance testing for fennec and desktop browsers as well. | ||
== Benchmarks == | |||
We'd like to address the wishlist of benchmarks given below (originally from [https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.b2g/88rr_Acs1DE/discussion this thread], and emailed suggestions): | |||
* Some brand name companies may ask for the performance of file reading/writing on different file sizes and file numbers. | |||
* app startup time. we should start with the most critical built-in apps (phone, | |||
sms, browser), we should also do 3rd party apps, both packaged and | |||
hosted ones. | |||
* I´d like to suggest boot time as a metric. This is specially interesting for the pandaboard user group, aiming to use B2G in OEM applications. | |||
== Meetings == | == Meetings == | ||