242
edits
Talk:L20n/Background: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
question
No edit summary |
(question) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I would call that an chicken-or-egg problem. Any architecture in that area can't really be only l10n or only i18n. | I would call that an chicken-or-egg problem. Any architecture in that area can't really be only l10n or only i18n. | ||
--[[User:AxelHecht|AxelHecht]] 08:25, 15 January 2007 (PST) | --[[User:AxelHecht|AxelHecht]] 08:25, 15 January 2007 (PST) | ||
how does knowing the gender helps you? in hebrew, for example, there are different plural forms for male and female, but there are plenty of exceptions, of male objects that have the female plural forms (can't think of an opposite case now). | |||
i can recall cases where there was a male/female problem when translating to hebrew, e.g. in the mail advanced search dialog, where "priority" is female, but uses the "is" operator. this operator should also be in female form, but it is used also with other operands which are male. how would l20n solve that? [[User:Tsahi|Tsahi]] 13:09, 24 March 2007 (PDT) | |||