Confirmed users
703
edits
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2013-10-01: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2013-10-01 (view source)
Revision as of 10:41, 1 October 2013
, 1 October 2013→Status of the SeaMonkey Buildbot Master and Tree
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
** pymake is failing with "invalid syntax" again because of an outdated Python. | ** pymake is failing with "invalid syntax" again because of an outdated Python. | ||
* No Windows langpacks since 8th April on trunk. Needs investigating. | * No Windows langpacks since 8th April on trunk. Needs investigating. | ||
** http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk-l10n/win32/xpi/ (as well as [http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk-l10n/mac/xpi/ .../mac/xpi/]) contain nothing more recent than 2.20a1. Not sure if a bug has been filed. [http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk-l10n/linux-i686/xpi/ Linux-i686] is OK… when the Linux builders are green of course (see "current linux bustage" bullet item below). Linux-x86_64 langpacks were never built (enhancement {{bug|892418}}), so that's OK too. Callek told me on IRC he has a hunch about why but more pressing things to do first. This is low priority since langpacks are supposed to be the same regardless of on which platform they were built, but it might indicate (I haven't checked) missing "full builds" for W32 and Mac other than en-US. [[User:Tonymec|Tonymec]] ([[User talk:Tonymec|talk]]) 17:53, 23 July 2013 (PDT) | ** http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk-l10n/win32/xpi/ (as well as [http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk-l10n/mac/xpi/ .../mac/xpi/]) contain nothing more recent than 2.20a1. Not sure if a bug has been filed. [http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk-l10n/linux-i686/xpi/ Linux-i686] is OK… when the Linux builders are green of course<!-- (see "current linux bustage" bullet item below)-->. Linux-x86_64 langpacks were never built (enhancement {{bug|892418}}), so that's OK too. Callek told me on IRC he has a hunch about why but more pressing things to do first. This is low priority since langpacks are supposed to be the same regardless of on which platform they were built, but it might indicate (I haven't checked) missing "full builds" for W32 and Mac other than en-US. [[User:Tonymec|Tonymec]] ([[User talk:Tonymec|talk]]) 17:53, 23 July 2013 (PDT) | ||
** Windows and Mac trunk langpacks directories have been removed on the FTP server, maybe for lack of recent XPIs (later than 2.20a1: see also {{bug|902876}}). Latest Linux langpacks are dated 29 August. | ** Windows and Mac trunk langpacks directories have been removed on the FTP server, maybe for lack of recent XPIs (later than 2.20a1: see also {{bug|902876}}). Latest Linux langpacks are dated 29 August. | ||
** Trunk, Aurora and Beta TBPLs are far more orange (or even red) than green; at the top of Aurora and Beta TBPLs there is a link to mozilla.org::ServerOps:DCOps {{bug|870207}} which is RESOLVED WONTFIX since June. SeaMonkey::RelEng {{Bug|884454}} has been opened as a followup. | ** Trunk, Aurora and Beta TBPLs are far more orange (or even red) than green; at the top of Aurora and Beta TBPLs there is a link to mozilla.org::ServerOps:DCOps {{bug|870207}} which is RESOLVED WONTFIX since June. SeaMonkey::RelEng {{Bug|884454}} has been opened as a followup. | ||