3
edits
Mozilla2:Unified Storage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Comments from Mariuz
| Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
=== Comments from Mariuz === | === Comments from Mariuz === | ||
>For example, Berkeley DB's license is incompatible with Mozilla, as is >Firebird's. | >For example, Berkeley DB's license is incompatible with Mozilla, as is >Firebird's. | ||
Firebird license is MPL based and is '''compatible''' | Firebird license is MPL based and is '''compatible''' | ||
| Line 266: | Line 267: | ||
>Using RDF as a back end is infeasable due to performance; and finally, using a >home-grown solution makes no sense. | >Using RDF as a back end is infeasable due to performance; and finally, using a >home-grown solution makes no sense. | ||
i agree :) | i agree :) | ||
it would be nice if Unified Storage will use other open source | it would be nice if Unified Storage will make use of other open source | ||
databases (like bugzilla is doing): imagine storing your | databases (like bugzilla is doing): imagine storing your bookmarks on a remote server using one sql db for it | ||
It should be written with db independence in mind | |||