Web Browser Grand Prix: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Web Browser Grand Prix (view source)

Revision as of 21:08, 27 April 2021

749 bytes added ,  27 April 2021
Mark as Outdated
m (Added WebVizBench link)
(Mark as Outdated)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{OutdatedSpiderMonkey}}
Tom's Hardware Guide publishes a ~semiannual browser review called the '''"Web Browser Grand Prix"''' (WBGP). Mozilla would like to invest more time optimizing for the Grand Prix's high-profile benchmarks:
Tom's Hardware Guide publishes a ~semiannual browser review called the '''"Web Browser Grand Prix"''' (WBGP). Mozilla would like to invest more time optimizing for the Grand Prix's high-profile benchmarks:


Line 5: Line 7:


WBGP also includes:
WBGP also includes:
* SunSpider (IE10, but SunSpider results not counted in overall scoring)
* Purdue's [http://jsbench.cs.purdue.edu/ JSBench] (Chrome)
* Purdue's [http://jsbench.cs.purdue.edu/ JSBench] (Chrome)
* [http://www.timo-ernst.net/misc/riabench-start/ RIABench JavaScript] (Chrome)
* [http://www.timo-ernst.net/misc/riabench-start/ RIABench JavaScript] (Chrome)
Line 13: Line 14:
* [http://www.kaizou.org/2011/06/kaizoumark-a-browser-animation-benchmark/ KaizouMark CSS] (Chrome)
* [http://www.kaizou.org/2011/06/kaizoumark-a-browser-animation-benchmark/ KaizouMark CSS] (Chrome)
* [http://www.kevs3d.co.uk/dev/canvasmark/ CanvasMark] (Chrome)
* [http://www.kevs3d.co.uk/dev/canvasmark/ CanvasMark] (Chrome)
* [http://webvizbench.com WebVizBench (IE10)
* [http://webvizbench.com WebVizBench] (IE10)
* [https://www.scirra.com/blog/77/internet-explorer-10-fast-and-native-has-gone-to-other-browsers Scirra WebGL 2D] (Opera)
* Scirra WebGL 2D: [https://www.scirra.com/blog/77/internet-explorer-10-fast-and-native-has-gone-to-other-browsers 2012 tests], [https://www.scirra.com/blog/144/the-great-html5-gaming-performance-test-2014-edition 2014 tests]
* [http://luic.github.io/WebGL-Performance-Benchmark/ LUIC WebGL 3D] (Firefox)
* [http://luic.github.io/WebGL-Performance-Benchmark/ LUIC WebGL 3D] (Firefox)
* Facebook's [https://github.com/facebook/jsgamebench JSGameBench] (Firefox)
* Facebook's [https://github.com/facebook/jsgamebench JSGameBench] (Firefox)
* [http://www.eembc.org/benchmark/browsing_sl.php EEMBC BrowsingBench]
* [http://www.browserscope.org/security/test BrowserScope Security test]
* [https://github.com/padenot/webaudio-benchmark padenot's webaudio test] ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882543 bug 882543])
Tom's Hardware describes their composite scoring: "We switched most of the composite scores from arithmetic mean (average) to geometric mean in order to ensure that every test in each category is given equal weight, regardless of absolute value. In order to minimize the effect of Dromaeo DOM in the final scoring, that test is now counted equally with the three JS tests in the final JavaScript/DOM composite score."


= Contacts =
= Contacts =
Line 25: Line 31:
** Hannes Verschore
** Hannes Verschore
** Boris Zbarsky
** Boris Zbarsky
** Sean Stangl
* PM: Chris Peterson
* PM: Chris Peterson


= Bugs =
= Bugs =


* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=933949 WBGP meta-bug 933949]: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=933949&hide_resolved=1 dependency tree]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=933949 WBGP meta-bug 933949]: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=933949&maxdepth=2&hide_resolved=1 dependency tree]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?j_top=OR&f1=bug_id&o3=substring&v3=browsermark&o1=equals&o2=equals&query_format=advanced&f3=short_desc&f2=blocked&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&v1=851699&v2=851699 Browsermark bugs]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?j_top=OR&f1=bug_id&o3=substring&v3=browsermark&o1=equals&o2=equals&query_format=advanced&f3=short_desc&f2=blocked&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&v1=851699&v2=851699 Browsermark bugs]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?j_top=OR&f1=bug_id&o3=substring&v3=Peacekeeper&o1=equals&o2=equals&query_format=advanced&f3=short_desc&f2=blocked&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&v1=499198&v2=499198 Peacekeeper bugs]
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?j_top=OR&f1=bug_id&o3=substring&v3=Peacekeeper&o1=equals&o2=equals&query_format=advanced&f3=short_desc&f2=blocked&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&v1=499198&v2=499198 Peacekeeper bugs]
Line 36: Line 43:
<bugzilla>
<bugzilla>
{
{
"blocks":"933949,851699,499198,933953,935279,935288,935296",
"blocks":"443564, 446344, 471020, 499198, 528661, 638217, 652780, 802882, 851699, 913153, 933953, 935279, 935288, 935296, 935299, 935302, 935304, 935309, 935313, 935327",
"status":["UNCONFIRMED", "NEW", "ASSIGNED", "REOPENED"],
"status":["UNCONFIRMED", "NEW", "ASSIGNED", "REOPENED"],
"include_fields": "id, summary, whiteboard, assigned_to, _"
"include_fields": "id, summary, whiteboard, assigned_to, _"
Line 50: Line 57:
! IE
! IE
! Opera
! Opera
|-
| June 2014?
| Chrome 32-33?
| Firefox 31-32?
| IE 11?
| Opera 23-24?
|-
| March 2014?
| Chrome 31-32?
| Firefox 27-28?
| IE 11?
| Opera 19-20?


|-
|-
Line 74: Line 67:
|-
|-
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-chrome-25-firefox-19,3459.html March 2013]
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-chrome-25-firefox-19,3459.html March 2013]
! style="background:#ffc;" | Chrome 25
! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 25
| Firefox 19
| Firefox 19
| IE 10
| IE 10
Line 81: Line 74:
|-
|-
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-15-safari-6-web-browser,3287.html September 2012]
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-15-safari-6-web-browser,3287.html September 2012]
! style="background:#ffc;" | Chrome 20
! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 20
| Firefox 15
| Firefox 15
| IE 9
| IE 9
Line 88: Line 81:
|-
|-
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/windows-7-chrome-20-firefox-13-opera-12,3228.html July 2012]
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/windows-7-chrome-20-firefox-13-opera-12,3228.html July 2012]
! style="background:#ffc;" | Chrome 20
! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 20
| Firefox 13
| Firefox 13
| IE 9
| IE 9
Line 98: Line 91:
| Firefox 11
| Firefox 11
| IE 9
| IE 9
! style="background:#ffc;" | Opera 11.61
! style="background:#bfb;" | Opera 11.61


|-
|-
Line 123: Line 116:
|-
|-
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013.html August 2011]
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/web-browser-performance-standard-html5,3013.html August 2011]
! style="background:#ffc;" | Chrome 13
! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 13
| Firefox 6
| Firefox 6
| IE 9
| IE 9
Line 130: Line 123:
|-
|-
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opera-firefox-chrome,2976.html July 2011]
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/opera-firefox-chrome,2976.html July 2011]
! style="background:#ffc;" | Chrome 12
! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 12
| Firefox 5
| Firefox 5
| IE 9
| IE 9
Line 139: Line 132:
| Chrome 10
| Chrome 10
| Firefox 4
| Firefox 4
! style="background:#ffc;" | IE 9
! style="background:#bfb;" | IE 9
| Opera 11.01
| Opera 11.01


Line 146: Line 139:
| Chrome 10
| Chrome 10
| Firefox 3.6
| Firefox 3.6
! style="background:#ffc;" | IE 9
! style="background:#bfb;" | IE 9
| Opera 11.01
| Opera 11.01


Line 154: Line 147:
| Firefox 3.6
| Firefox 3.6
| IE 9
| IE 9
! style="background:#ffc;" | Opera 10.60
! style="background:#bfb;" | Opera 10.60


|-
|-
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-chrome-opera,2558.html March 2010]
! [http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-chrome-opera,2558.html March 2010]
! style="background:#ffc;" | Chrome 4
! style="background:#bfb;" | Chrome 4
| Firefox 3.6
| Firefox 3.6
| IE 8
| IE 8
| Opera 10.50
| Opera 10.50
|}
|}
Mgaudet1
52

edits

Retrieved from "https://wiki.allizom.org/Special:MobileDiff/752345...1235274"

Navigation menu