Update:Remora Feedback: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Replacing page with '= Beta Feedback - http://preview.addons.mozilla.org = This page is for consolidation of the feedback on the new AMO Beta. If you're more comfortable filing bugs, you're [https...')
Line 1: Line 1:
= Beta Feedback - http://preview.addons.mozilla.org =
= Beta Feedback - http://preview.addons.mozilla.org =
This page is for consolidation of the feedback on the new AMO Beta.  If you're more comfortable filing bugs, you're [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=addons.mozilla.org&version=3.2 welcome to do that] instead.
This page is for consolidation of the feedback on the new AMO Beta.  If you're more comfortable filing bugs, you're [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=addons.mozilla.org&version=3.2 welcome to do that] instead.
== Accessibility ==
* Changing text size results in bad layout. Ways to correct this: #otherAlso should specify min-width rather than width; class .addon has a background image of addon-tr.png - the vertical size of this image is not very big, so it quickly results in missing borders when text size is increased a fraction.
* Unfortunately #otherAlso has been taken out of the flow and is absolutely positioned resulting in it overlapping other content at non-default text sizes.
These sort of problems also tend to present themselves at higher DPI - have you tested at 120dpi?
== SEO ==
* The title "Firefox Addons" should be an H1, not an H2 so that search engines will pick it up. At the moment, the H1 is an image saying "mozilla" - not really something a search engine would find... Also, I'm not sure why font sizes and font colors are specified for that H1 given that it only contains an image.
* A meta description would give a search engine something to pull off the page.
== Overflow ==
Even at normal font size, URLs in the body text of the addon description break out of the .addon class container. This looks bad. You could give the addon class a overflow:hidden but that's usually unsatisfactory. Gecko still doesn't implement text-overflow:ellipsis (bug #312156) or word-wrap (bug #99457) so the only other option is to inject <wbr> (or equivalent numeric entity) at alternate characters in long strings as chatzilla does.
--[[User:Rbirkby|Rbirkby]] 11:06, 15 February 2008 (PST)
1

edit

Navigation menu