Confirmed users
1,492
edits
Update:Remora Feedback: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Added sections about FF version and advanced search) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Advanced search == | == Advanced search == | ||
There should be some form that allows a more advanced search, especially the specification of a FF version and/or OS that the addon must be compatible with. Other advanced search features should be an option to exclude or include "experimental" addons or limit the extensions to those of specific authors. | There should be some form that allows a more advanced search, especially the specification of a FF version and/or OS that the addon must be compatible with. Other advanced search features should be an option to exclude or include "experimental" addons or limit the extensions to those of specific authors. | ||
== Usability / UI revisions == | |||
* People who are used to the term "themes" (existing users) are having difficulty finding them in the current hierarchy. | |||
** Potential solution: Finish changing the name of the category from "Interface Customizations" to "Themes & Appearance" | |||
* There's inconsistency between what down-arrows mean on menu headers (there's a drop-down menu available here) vs. what they mean on "Add to Firefox" buttons (up for debate! "down"load?) | |||
** Potential solution: remove the down arrow from the "Add to Firefox" buttons. The arrow doesn't really have much useful semantic meaning -- it doesn't really convey "add to firefox" -- so it's really just clutter. | |||
* The issue of not knowing whether a given add-on is compatible with your version of Firefox/other application is a big deal | |||