canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
2,104
edits
Webmaker/Testing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Results
| Line 256: | Line 256: | ||
===Results=== | ===Results=== | ||
Read the | Read the findings about what is a [[Webmaker/Get_Involved#Super_Mentors | Super Mentor]]. | ||
Summary: | Summary: | ||
* In general, there's was a lot of support for the skills, experiences and support we identified for Webmaker Super Mentors. | * In general, there's was a lot of support for the skills, experiences and support we identified for Webmaker Super Mentors. | ||
* Training, badging and decision making were key ways that people identified as good for Super Mentors. | |||
* There is some discussion around: | * There is some discussion around: | ||
** '''Web literacy.''' How much does a Super Mentor need to know? Do they need to know about tools beyond Webmaker, like Scratch, Arduino, etc.? Consensus seems that those are great to have, but not essential. | ** '''Web literacy.''' How much does a Super Mentor need to know? Do they need to know about tools beyond Webmaker, like Scratch, Arduino, etc.? Consensus seems that those are great to have, but not essential. | ||
** '''Pedagogy.''' This term was a flashpoint. It resonated with some people and not others. It's been reframed now as ''Super Mentors are very knowledgeable and experienced in how people learn and strategies to teach skills to others.'' | ** '''Pedagogy.''' This term was a flashpoint. It resonated with some people and not others. It's been reframed now as ''Super Mentors are very knowledgeable and experienced in how people learn and strategies to teach skills to others.'' | ||
* | ** '''Recognition.''' We don't have a clear and good way to recognize Super Mentors. Profiles on webmaker.org didn't seem adequate or interesting to most. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||