350
edits
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
** What went bad? | ** What went bad? | ||
** What should change? | ** What should change? | ||
* David asking for [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird/browse_thread/thread/124f97733b50afea?fwc=1 meeting time change] | |||
=== Meeting Log === | === Meeting Log === | ||
* Participants: | * Participants: bryan, Archaeopteryx, dbo, davida, Hb, sipaq, dmose | ||
* 0.9 post mortem: | |||
** dbo: overall timeline was OK, we slipped not too much | |||
** dbo: certainly late lightning RC1 (incl full l10n) has been a problem; put pressure on l10n guys | |||
** davida: hasn't followed 0.9 so closely, but in general wished 0.9 would have landed earlier. | |||
** sipaq: questions quality of 0.9, and requests QA improvements | |||
* general discussion about why the calendar status call attendance varies so much. | |||
* davida: asks why #calendar is often so quiet while #maildev has life... | |||
** dbo thinks the main reason is that more developers are interested in thunderbird | |||
** dbo thinks another reason might be that most of the calendar guys are europeans | |||
** sipaq will post an email around to the team to ask for reasons about the call and IRC. | |||
* dmose is concerned about the current trunk quality, he's figured out a lot of annoying bugs, esp. dataloss. | |||
* davida and dbo propose to adopt some agile methods, e.g. defining a sprint that focuses on calendar integration (''menus, modes''). |
edits