Calendar:Status Meetings:2008-10-01: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
** What went bad?
** What went bad?
** What should change?
** What should change?
''more to come...''
* David asking for [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird/browse_thread/thread/124f97733b50afea?fwc=1 meeting time change]


=== Meeting Log ===
=== Meeting Log ===
* Participants:
* Participants: bryan, Archaeopteryx, dbo, davida, Hb, sipaq, dmose
 
* 0.9 post mortem:
** dbo: overall timeline was OK, we slipped not too much
** dbo: certainly late lightning RC1 (incl full l10n) has been a problem; put pressure on l10n guys
** davida: hasn't followed 0.9 so closely, but in general wished 0.9 would have landed earlier.
** sipaq: questions quality of 0.9, and requests QA improvements
 
* general discussion about why the calendar status call attendance varies so much.
 
* davida: asks why #calendar is often so quiet while #maildev has life...
** dbo thinks the main reason is that more developers are interested in thunderbird
** dbo thinks another reason might be that most of the calendar guys are europeans
** sipaq will post an email around to the team to ask for reasons about the call and IRC.
 
* dmose is concerned about the current trunk quality, he's figured out a lot of annoying bugs, esp. dataloss.
 
* davida and dbo propose to adopt some agile methods, e.g. defining a sprint that focuses on calendar integration (''menus, modes'').