Calendar:Status Meetings:2008-10-01: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:22, 2 October 2008

Toll free numbers
- US/Canada: 866-692-3163
- Netherlands: 0800-020-1392
- Germany: 0800-000-3441
- Switzerland: 0800-001-523
Participant Passcode
- 3182189
Conference controls
- Press *1 private help menu
- Press *6 mute or un-mute individual line
Each time you say something, please say your name first so people know who's speaking

0.9 Post Mortem Sum Up:
- What went well?
- What went bad?
- What should change?
David asking for meeting time change

0.9 post mortem:
- dbo: overall timeline was OK, we slipped not too much
- dbo: certainly late lightning RC1 (incl full l10n) has been a problem; put pressure on l10n guys
- davida: hasn't followed 0.9 so closely, but in general wished 0.9 would have landed earlier.
- sipaq: questions quality of 0.9, and requests QA improvements

general discussion about why the calendar status call attendance varies so much.

davida: asks why #calendar is often so quiet while #maildev has life...
- dbo thinks the main reason is that more developers are interested in thunderbird
- dbo thinks another reason might be that most of the calendar guys are europeans
- sipaq will post an email around to the team to ask for reasons about the call and IRC.

dmose is concerned about the current trunk quality, he's figured out a lot of annoying bugs, esp. dataloss.

davida and dbo propose to adopt some agile methods, e.g. defining a sprint that focuses on calendar integration (menus, modes).

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ** What went bad?
 ** What should change?
-''more to come...''
+* David asking for [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird/browse_thread/thread/124f97733b50afea?fwc=1 meeting time change]
 === Meeting Log ===
-* Participants:
+* Participants: bryan, Archaeopteryx, dbo, davida, Hb, sipaq, dmose
+* 0.9 post mortem:
+** dbo: overall timeline was OK, we slipped not too much
+** dbo: certainly late lightning RC1 (incl full l10n) has been a problem; put pressure on l10n guys
+** davida: hasn't followed 0.9 so closely, but in general wished 0.9 would have landed earlier.
+** sipaq: questions quality of 0.9, and requests QA improvements
+* general discussion about why the calendar status call attendance varies so much.
+* davida: asks why #calendar is often so quiet while #maildev has life...
+** dbo thinks the main reason is that more developers are interested in thunderbird
+** dbo thinks another reason might be that most of the calendar guys are europeans
+** sipaq will post an email around to the team to ask for reasons about the call and IRC.
+* dmose is concerned about the current trunk quality, he's figured out a lot of annoying bugs, esp. dataloss.
+* davida and dbo propose to adopt some agile methods, e.g. defining a sprint that focuses on calendar integration (''menus, modes'').