Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925
edits
GovernanceIssues: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Next Steps: work with reed to make sure the list is complete. Read it carefully and make a proposal. | Next Steps: work with reed to make sure the list is complete. Read it carefully and make a proposal. | ||
===Module Owners List=== | ===Module Owners List=== | ||
| Line 72: | Line 60: | ||
Next Steps: send email to all who have not signed, this time giving a deadline after which accounts will be disabled. | Next Steps: send email to all who have not signed, this time giving a deadline after which accounts will be disabled. | ||
===Bug Triage=== | |||
Go through open governance bugs and attempt to resolve - either immediately, or via this list. At the moment, it doesn't look like there's anything major on there. | |||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=mozilla.org&component=Governance&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&resolution=---&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= List of open mozilla.org/Governance bugs] (<strike>24</strike> 18 at time of writing) | |||
Next Steps: triage ongoing. | |||
===Discussion Forums=== | |||
There are several issues with the current technical implementation - the unresponsiveness of Google re: Google Groups and so on. Need to look at whether to take the web interface part back in house, and/or put in place other anti-spam measures. | |||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/7d418189694b88d1# mozilla.governance thread on mailing list spam] | |||
Next Steps: start discussion with IT about technical options. | |||
==On Hold== | |||
===Monday Meeting=== | ===Monday Meeting=== | ||
| Line 82: | Line 89: | ||
Next Steps: Reopen discussion on the purpose of the meeting. | Next Steps: Reopen discussion on the purpose of the meeting. | ||
=== | ===Governance Community=== | ||
The community of people discussing governance issues itself could do with broadening and expanding. Too often, those most affected by governance decisions do not take part in the formulation of policy. Why is this? | |||
===Other Module Ownership Issues=== | |||
The discussion at the all-hands brought up issues other than non-code modules, such as whether some modules were too big, and whether we need to actively search for 'outside peers'. | |||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/d142e16757257f25# Mark's summary of all-hands discussion] on module ownership | |||
Next Steps: get Mitchell's opinion on whether any issues in Mark's summary are worth chasing up. | |||
==Being Resolved== | ==Being Resolved== | ||
| Line 105: | Line 109: | ||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/1c7c826dca44043c# Mike's latest draft] | * [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.governance/browse_thread/thread/1c7c826dca44043c# Mike's latest draft] | ||
== Open Issues== | == Open Issues== | ||
* Is there a "review policy" item, other than the one above? | * Is there a "review policy" item, other than the one above? | ||