Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,083
edits
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2008-12-30: Difference between revisions
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2008-12-30 (view source)
Revision as of 01:04, 21 January 2011
, 21 January 2011moved SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2008-12-30 to SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2008-12-30: / is a much nicer separator :)
Philip Chee (talk | contribs) |
m (moved SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2008-12-30 to SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2008-12-30: / is a much nicer separator :)) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<small>[[SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2008-12-16|« last meeting]] | [[SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings|index]]</small> | <small>[[SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2008-12-16|« last meeting]] | [[SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings|index]] | [[SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-01-13|next meeting »]]</small> | ||
'''SeaMonkey Meeting Details''' | '''SeaMonkey Meeting Details''' | ||
| Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
** infrastructure for running tests | ** infrastructure for running tests | ||
** filing bugs for leaks in (TUnit and Reftest) tests | ** filing bugs for leaks in (TUnit and Reftest) tests | ||
** doing an (experimental) Windows mozilla-central SeaMonkey build, reporting to {{bug|470184}} issue tracking; hoping for {{bug|464325}} new tinderboxes. | |||
==== Standard8 ==== | ==== Standard8 ==== | ||
| Line 107: | Line 108: | ||
* Now that feeds are in mailnews we probably need to get some reorganisation of components in bugzilla. | * Now that feeds are in mailnews we probably need to get some reorganisation of components in bugzilla. | ||
** We should talk with the mailnews people on what they want on this. | ** We should talk with the mailnews people on what they want on this. | ||
** | ** We should also file a BMO reorganization bug to track SeaMonkey/Thunderbird requirements. | ||
* Thunderbird is moving towards building mozilla-central nightlies as well as mozilla-1.9.1 nightlies. What are SM plans on this? | * Thunderbird is moving towards building mozilla-central nightlies as well as mozilla-1.9.1 nightlies. What are SM plans on this? | ||
** We don't have the hardware for this at the moment. | ** We don't have the hardware for this at the moment. | ||
** {{bug|464325}} is tracking our hardware requirements. | ** {{bug|464325}} is tracking our hardware requirements. | ||
** See also {{bug|470184}} Track comm-central issues building with mozilla-central | |||