Confirmed users
561
edits
Auto-tools/Projects/B2G Test And Performance: Difference between revisions
Auto-tools/Projects/B2G Test And Performance (view source)
Revision as of 14:42, 24 August 2012
, 24 August 2012→Benchmarks
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
We'd like to address the wishlist of benchmarks given below (originally from [https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.b2g/88rr_Acs1DE/discussion this thread], and emailed suggestions): | We'd like to address the wishlist of benchmarks given below (originally from [https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.b2g/88rr_Acs1DE/discussion this thread], and emailed suggestions): | ||
* Some brand name companies may ask for the performance of file reading/writing on different file sizes and file numbers. | * Some brand name companies may ask for the performance of file reading/writing on different file sizes and file numbers. | ||
* | * App startup time. we should start with the most critical built-in apps (phone, sms, browser), we should also do 3rd party apps, both packaged and hosted ones. [suggested by sicking] | ||
sms, browser), we should also do 3rd party apps, both packaged and | * I´d like to suggest boot time as a metric. This is specially interesting for the pandaboard user group, aiming to use B2G in OEM applications. [suggested by ieee engineer, off-thread] | ||
hosted ones. | |||
* I´d like to suggest boot time as a metric. This is specially interesting for the pandaboard user group, aiming to use B2G in OEM applications. | |||
== Meetings == | == Meetings == | ||