14
edits
Editmonkey (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
=== Any other business? === | === Any other business? === | ||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/request.cgi?action=queue&product=SeaMonkey&type=review&group=type review] and [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/request.cgi?action=queue&product=SeaMonkey&type=superreview&group=type superreview] request lists are quite long and have a number of quite old entries. Everything from previous years should probably checked for validity. If your name is on either the "Requester" or "Requestee" column of any request older than this year, please check if it's still valid and cancel it if it's not. In some cases, reassigning to different people might also be in order. | * [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/request.cgi?action=queue&product=SeaMonkey&type=review&group=type review] and [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/request.cgi?action=queue&product=SeaMonkey&type=superreview&group=type superreview] request lists are quite long and have a number of quite old entries. Everything from previous years should probably checked for validity. If your name is on either the "Requester" or "Requestee" column of any request older than this year, please check if it's still valid and cancel it if it's not. In some cases, reassigning to different people might also be in order. | ||
* Move the meeting to another day of the week? mcsmurf is busy on Tuesday, any other day of the week is fine though | |||
* Should we [http://markmail.org/message/u7e7pqgv2n7qinib expire mass-UNCO bugs that are still without comments] as they have gone 5 years without any activity, even though there was a warning and incentive for action 10 months a go? | * Should we [http://markmail.org/message/u7e7pqgv2n7qinib expire mass-UNCO bugs that are still without comments] as they have gone 5 years without any activity, even though there was a warning and incentive for action 10 months a go? | ||
** Yes, I think we should do that -- mcsmurf | |||
* ? | * ? |
edits