27
edits
Update:Archive/2.0/Developers: Difference between revisions
added comments about content outsourced to Wiki
Chrisblore (talk | contribs) (added comments about content outsourced to Wiki) |
|||
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
:'''Comments''' | :'''Comments''' | ||
:I disagree with outsourcing most, if not all of this to a Wiki. I believe that pages about a site, updates and news about a site and FAQs about a site should be on the site in question. I'd also expect policies about a site to be on the site in question too. --[[User:Csogilvie|Colin]] 09:42, 18 May 2005 (PDT) | :I disagree with outsourcing most, if not all of this to a Wiki. I believe that pages about a site, updates and news about a site and FAQs about a site should be on the site in question. I'd also expect policies about a site to be on the site in question too. --[[User:Csogilvie|Colin]] 09:42, 18 May 2005 (PDT | ||
::As would I. It's much easier to keep track of documents as well if they are on the same site. We need to make sure that the developer and reviewer guides are available directly and easily from their respective control panels.--[[User:Chrisblore|Chrisblore]] 06:50, 22 May 2005 (PDT) | |||
=== Developers === | === Developers === | ||