DOM/Web Forms 2.0

This page is intended as a general organization page (and to a smaller extent, a roadmap) for implementing the Web Forms 2.0 specification (WF2). The primary tracking bug for this is bug 344614.

Note this page is very, very incomplete at this time. Web Forms 2.0 is a big specification, and implementation will take time.

Key Personnel

It takes a village...

The following people are definitely committed to working on WF2.

• Alex Vincent, implementer
• Shawn Wilsher, implementer
• Ian Hickson, as specification author

The following people may be useful resources, but have not committed yet to working on WF2.

• Aaron Leventhal, accessibility guru
• Alexander Surkov, XForms contact
• Neil Rashbrook, XUL guru

For review and module ownership purposes, Web Forms 2.0 work is currently considered a part of the Document Object Model module. The owners and peers of this module are also helpful references, but they have not actively committed to working on WF2.

Goals For Implementation

We'd like to try having Web Forms 2.0 in place for the Gecko 1.9 release. However, we anticipate reviews being a large bottleneck for this, and may not have a complete implementation until Gecko 1.10.

There has been no decision yet on whether or not to develop this code on a branch or not. The implementers are currently progressing on the assumption that this work will proceed on trunk.

Technologies

IDL

Most of the interfaces WF2 extends are from DOM Level 2 HTML. However, these interfaces are considered FROZEN by mozilla.org, so we cannot actually modify these interfaces.

On the other hand, we can define new interfaces to implement the extended properties and methods. Therefore, by convention, we plan on doing this, with each new interface prefixed by the string: "nsIDOMWF2". (Content peers suggested prefixing with at least "nsIDOM", and we include WF2 to indicate the source of these new interfaces.)

Common form control properties and methods will be included into a nsIDOMWF2FormControl interface, for ease of reuse. Specific form control interfaces will extend this interface.

Note that web pages must not need to QueryInterface to these interfaces in order to use their capabilities. The properties and methods these interfaces provide and define must be available by default.

nsIDOMWF2FormElement

• Contributor: Alex Vincent

• Properties and methods:
  • attribute DOMString accept;
  • attribute DOMString replace;
  • attribute DOMString data;
  • readonly attribute HTMLCollection templateElements;
  • bool checkValidity();
  • void resetFromData(in Document data);
  • void dispatchFormInput();
  • void dispatchFormChange();

• Status: Initial implementation (checkValidity) under review (bug 345822).

nsIDOMWF2FormControl

• Contributor: Alex Vincent

• Properties and methods:
  • readonly attribute boolean willValidate;
  • readonly attribute nsIDOMWF2ValidityState validity;
  • boolean checkValidity();
  • readonly attribute DOMString validationMessage;
  • void setCustomValidity(in DOMString error);

• Status: Initial implementation (willValidate, validity, checkValidity) under review (bug 345822).

nsIDOMWF2InputElement

• Contributor: Alex Vincent

nsIDOMWF2ValidityState

• Contributor: Alex Vincent

nsIDOMWF2OutputElement

• Contributor: Alex Vincent

nsIDOMWF2RepetitionElement

• Contributor: Shawn Wilsher

XTF

Unfortunately, as XTF applies to new namespaces and Web Forms 2 lives exclusively in HTML and XHTML, XTF is not very useful for Web Forms 2.0.

XBL

Everyone agrees as much of this implementation should be written in XBL as possible. However, XBL 1 cannot always guarantee a binding will apply. In particular, the display: none; style rule will disable a XBL 1 binding from applying.

As a general rule of thumb (from Jonas Sicking), anonymous content can be done in XBL 1, but not implementation or event handlers.

XBL 2 is a wild card here. (Need elaboration.)

DHTML Behaviors

• https://sourceforge.net/projects/wf2/

This has not been actively explored yet. It may be feasible, but for the same reasons XBL is not suitable, this may not be acceptable to content peers.

XForms

Wherever it is practical, we'd like to share common code with the XForms extension (bug 344655). No one has yet done a formal analysis of where such code sharing might take place, or where it should be placed in our CVS repository.

Web Forms 2.0 cannot depend on XForms, however, as XForms is an extension, not built by default. XForms also depends on schema-validation, another extension not built by default. Neither are in core code, so they cannot be used as dependencies for core code.

New objects

DOMWF2ValidityState

• Contributor: Alex Vincent

New events

RepetitionEvent

• Contributor: Shawn Wilsher

New elements

<html:repeat>

• Contributor: Shawn Wilsher
• Accessibility

<html:output>

• Contributor: Alex Vincent
• Accessibility

New input types

<html:input type='number'>

• Accessibility

<html:input type='uri'>

• Accessibility

<html:input type='range'>

• Accessibility

<html:input> date/time inputs

• Accessibility

New input attributes

pattern

• Contributor: Alex Vincent
• Accessibility

required

• Contributor: Alex Vincent
• Accessibility

QA & Testing

Bonus: Extensions to XUL from WF2

Because many XUL controls are largely derived from HTML form controls, we will be able to add new capabilities to XUL controls as they are added to baseline HTML form controls.