SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2016-03-29: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎frg: Statistics
(→‎frg: Old Unconfirmed Bugs)
(→‎frg: Statistics)
Line 215: Line 215:
* When looking in Bugzilla what to do next I found a lot of in my eyes obsolete bugs in a short time. Who can close them. Tracking them in a meta bug?
* When looking in Bugzilla what to do next I found a lot of in my eyes obsolete bugs in a short time. Who can close them. Tracking them in a meta bug?
:: '''''Comment:''''' I am working on this problem. We have lots of [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?classification=Client%20Software&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&product=SeaMonkey&list_id=12936940 UNCONFIRMED Bugs], many of them old /obsolete. But in my systematic review (may be 3 ... 5 each week) I find (approximately) 25% of these old bugs real bugs, half of them ''Core'' half of them really SeaMonkey bugs. With this speed review still will take 2 more years or so, but I think it's better than a mass-close. -- [[User:Rrbd|Rrbd]] ([[User talk:Rrbd|talk]]) 10:53, 29 March 2016 (PDT)
:: '''''Comment:''''' I am working on this problem. We have lots of [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?classification=Client%20Software&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&product=SeaMonkey&list_id=12936940 UNCONFIRMED Bugs], many of them old /obsolete. But in my systematic review (may be 3 ... 5 each week) I find (approximately) 25% of these old bugs real bugs, half of them ''Core'' half of them really SeaMonkey bugs. With this speed review still will take 2 more years or so, but I think it's better than a mass-close. -- [[User:Rrbd|Rrbd]] ([[User talk:Rrbd|talk]]) 10:53, 29 March 2016 (PDT)
::: Some more precise statistics [https://unofficialseamonkeynews.wordpress.com/2016/03/30/qa-statistics-for-old-seamonkey-bugs/ here in the unofficial blog]. -- [[User:Rrbd|Rrbd]] ([[User talk:Rrbd|talk]]) 22:31, 29 March 2016 (PDT)


==== IanN ====
==== IanN ====
Confirmed users
538

edits

Navigation menu